PROTECTION
The government increased identification of trafficking victims, but provided victims inadequate assistance. Police
reported identifying 17 potential victims of sex trafficking and 42 victims of forced labor (including some victims
from China and Guyana) compared with four potential trafficking sex victims in 2013. Police reported providing
identified victims basic assistance including food, medical care, counseling, and short-term shelter.Without
adequate financial support, police shouldered responsibility for providing basic services to victims and referred
them to short-term shelters for victims of domestic abuse. NGOs provided shelter and services to child trafficking
victims; however, police placed some child victims in juvenile detention facilities. Suriname lacked specialized,
long-term shelters for adult trafficking victims, and victim protection services for adults and children were
inadequate. In 2013, the Ministry of Social Affairs launched a process to open a government-run shelter for child
and women trafficking victims, but this shelter remained unopened at the close of the reporting period. The
government did not report what funding—if any—it provided to NGO shelters or for victim assistance.The government
did not sponsor any specific programs to facilitate victims’ reintegration, such as a witness protection program or
long-term psychological counseling. The government had no specialized mechanism to provide foreign victims with
alternatives to their removal to countries where they faced retribution or hardship. After a trafficking court case
concluded, foreign victims could apply for the same work or residency permits available to other foreign citizens;
however, no victims did so during the year. There were no reports of trafficking victims penalized for crimes
committed as a direct result of being subjected to human trafficking.Victims had the option of pursuing civil suits
against their traffickers, but no such cases were reported. Authorities employed some formal procedures to identify
victims, though health care workers did not screen for trafficking indicators among persons in prostitution, and
victim identification in the interior was limited.
PREVENTION
The government decreased prevention efforts.The government did not report progress on its efforts to implement
Suriname’s 2014- 2018 roadmap to combat trafficking.The interagency anti-trafficking working group, active since
2003, consisted of representatives from six government agencies and one NGO.The working group was
not effective in coordinating anti-trafficking efforts.The government announced plans to establish a new
interagency structure to oversee anti-trafficking efforts and disband the existing working group in December 2014;
this new structure was not in place at the end of the reporting period. The police anti-trafficking unit held
awareness sessions on radio and television and placed ads in newspapers warning potential victims of fraudulent job
offers. The anti-trafficking police maintained a hotline, although it did not receive any calls during the year.
The government made no efforts to reduce the demand for commercial sex acts or forced labor.The government did not
provide anti-trafficking training or guidance for its diplomatic personnel.
SWAZILAND: Tier 2
Swaziland is a source, destination, and transit country for men, women, and children subjected to sex trafficking
and forced labor. Swazi girls, particularly orphans, are subjected to sex trafficking and domestic servitude,
primarily in Swaziland and South Africa. Swazi chiefs may coerce children and adults—through threats and
intimidation—to work for the king. Swazi boys and foreign children are forced to labor in commercial agriculture,
including cattle herding, and market vending within the country. Traffickers reportedly force Mozambican women into
prostitution in Swaziland, or transit Swaziland en route to South Africa. Mozambican boys migrate to Swaziland for
work washing cars, herding livestock, and portering; some of these boys subsequently become victims of forced
labor. Reports suggest labor brokers fraudulently recruit and charge excessive fees to Swazi nationals for work in
South African mines—means often used to facilitate trafficking crimes. Swazi men in border communities are
recruited for forced labor in South Africa’s timber industry.Traffickers utilize Swaziland as a transit country for
transporting foreign victims from beyond the region to South Africa for forced labor. Some Swazi women are forced
into prostitution in South Africa and Mozambique after voluntarily migrating in search of work.
The Government of Swaziland does not fully comply with the minimum standards for the elimination of trafficking;
however, it is making significant efforts to do so. During the year, the government conducted nine investigations,
an increase from three the previous year, and initiated prosecution of an internal child sex trafficking case.
Nonetheless, the government did not obtain a conviction during the reporting period. The government continued to
assist victims with basic necessities such as food, clothing and shelter, toiletries, counseling, and medical care
in collaboration with NGOs. It provided repatriation assistance to one Swazi national, and the police cooperated
with South African counterparts in the investigation of transnational trafficking cases.The anti-trafficking
taskforce and its secretariat continued to effectively guide anti- trafficking efforts in 2014 and increased
awareness-raising efforts, introducing a bi-monthly newspaper column and radio program to educate the public on
trafficking.
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR SWAZILAND:
Enact amendments to the 2010 anti-trafficking act to allow for permanent residency of foreign trafficking victims;
complete and disseminate implementing regulations for the 2010 anti-trafficking act’s victim protection and
prevention provisions; vigorously investigate and prosecute trafficking offenses, including domestic trafficking
cases, and convict and punish trafficking offenders; begin regulating labor brokers and investigate allegations of
fraudulent recruitment; ensure the activities of the taskforce, secretariat, and implementing departments are
sufficiently funded, particularly to enable the provision of adequate accommodation and care to victims and
implementation of the strategic framework; ensure victim identification is not tied to the successful prosecution
of a trafficker; institutionalize training of officials, particularly police, prosecutors, and judges, on the 2010
anti-trafficking act and case investigation techniques; develop and implement formal procedures to proactively
identify trafficking victims and train officials on such procedures; complete development of a formal system to
refer victims to care; establish a unified system for collecting trafficking case data for use by all stakeholders;
and conduct anti-trafficking public awareness campaigns, particularly in the rural areas.
|